Tuesday, September 25, 2012

d(13): Fly with the wind

   
Most European blockbuster shows happen every year: Milan Design Week, Art Basel… and the alternating art/architecture line-up makes Venice Biennale also an annual event. But documenta in Kassel is only once in five years. It sounded like a more precious experience that I couldn’t miss. So I went.

I walked in the Fridericianum – the heart of documenta since its inception in 1955 – with high expectations. Oddly, the ground floor was almost empty except a few small Julio González sculptures from the early documenta shows. In a smaller and also empty side room I saw dust and hair swirling in the corner. What was going on here? I pulled out my guidebook and read: “A light breeze is blowing through the Fridericianum’s entire ground floor… It’s not a strong wind, not immediately recognizable as artificial, but physical enough to create a moment of wonder in the viewer…” British artist Ryan Gander “takes care to avoid any ‘style’ or ‘signature’ as an artist, drawing instead from a deep pool of ideas that are manifested in a multitude of formal means and media… Gander’s rhizomatic system of perception allows for various entry points but resists conclusive interpretation. He deconstructs terms and definitions in both a linguistic and a formal sense, while at the same time frustrating our desire for full accessibility, comprehensibility, or performativity.” Oh yes, I did feel the gust of wind.

Ryan Gander, I Need Some Meaning I Can Memorise (The Invisible Pull), 2012

Upstairs, two dead flies were displayed in a glass vitrine. Sorry, I had to turn to my guidebook again. These two tsetse flies “are a fertile female and her sterile consort.” Thai artist Pratchaya Phinthong wanted to show “Africa’s epidemic disease, and how Europe and the rest of the world try to control the deadly tsetse fly in Africa.” “He studied this subject on an extensive research trip to Africa, mainly to Ethiopia, Tanzania, and Zambia… Together with local people he invests in simple, inexpensive traps with which tsetse populations can be monitored and effectively controlled…”
Pratchaya Phinthong, Sleeping Sickness, 2012

“Is this art?” I couldn’t help wondering. Joseph Beuys once said, “Everyone is an artist.” With dOCUMENTA (13), artistic director Carolyn Christov-Bakargiev declared, “Everything can be art.” Over the years, there has been more and more emphasis on the intangible dimension of art: conceptual, ephemeral, and even invisible. d(13) intensified and solidified this tendency and marked a milestone in the historic shift. It articulated the particular conditions of our time with four themes: on stage / under siege / in a state of hope / on retreat, expanding the format of art beyond the traditional physicality.

The rotunda of the Fridericianum – metaphorically named “The Brain” – showed where Christov-Bakargiev’s lines of curatorial thought came from. The semicircular space was packed with artworks and objects brought together to illustrate a concept. You see Man Ray’s “indestructible” metronomes, Judith Barry’s polyhedron model sketches, Giuseppe Penone’s pair of real and replica river stones, Tamás St. Turba’s Czechoslovak brick-radio suggesting the relationship between media and activism, and even objects that Lee Miller took from Hitler’s bathroom. They are objects beyond the object, something I may call “objects with long texts.” They rely heavily on narratives and you had to read to really understand the memories, “troubled histories,” and “shifting connotations” embedded in them.

Man Ray, Object to be Destroyed / Object of Destruction / Indestructible Object, 1932-71
Tamás St. Turba, Czechoslovak Radio, 1968
Giuseppe Penone, Essere fiume 6, 1998

Outside of the Fridericianum, the theme got a bit looser in the satellite venues. But you still found traces of the same thoughts. In Ottoneum, Kassel’s natural history museum, I saw piles of rammed ingot forms laid out in a room. “Soil-erg,” as it was called, was actually “a form of currency that anyone can make by composting,” created by American artist Claire Pentecost as “a sustainable alternative to the petro-dollar.” The idea was further demonstrated with a vertical farm in the garden. In the industrial spaces behind Hauptbahnhof, Christodoulos Panayiotou brought in utility poles from Cyprus. They were “recently removed from Odos Anexartisias (Independence Street), the central commercial street of Limassol, as part of the general gentrification and ‘urban development’ plans for the city.” He removed the cables, laid down the stripped wooden poles horizontally on the floor. “Displaced, dysfunctional and disaffected, these objects summarize a series of charged layers. They indicate, among other strata, the end of chapter in the illumination of the modern city, and the specific use of wooden poles for the communication of information.”
Claire Pentecost, Soil-erg, 2012
Christodoulos Panayiotou, Independent Street, 2012

The intangible side of art is often quite political. It’s even more intense in documenta because of its weighty history. When the first documenta was organized by Arnold Bode in 1955, it was meant to eradicate “the cultural darkness of Nazism” and simultaneously establish Germany as a participant in the modern art world. The art show was set up in a city heavily destroyed by bombs during WWII, and war and conflicts has been a constant theme here since the beginning. This time, Kader Attia juxtaposed sculptures of European soldiers who were injured and deformed during WWI and African objects that had been repaired with visible mends. Creating a strong sensual and physical experience, the installation asked “the fundamental questions about the different ethical and aesthetical concepts of ‘repair,’ the Western illusion of perfection and post-traumatic healing.” Inspired by a press photo in 1933 in which a Nazi officer trapped a donkey in a barbed wire fence – a symbolic “concentration camp for stubborn citizens” in Kassel, Croatian artist Sanja Iveković created an installation in the Neue Galerie with stuffed toy donkeys tagged with names of icons who defied injustice and oppression in the 20th and 21st centuries, including Martin Luther King, Walter Benjamin, Che Guevara, Bobby Sands, Jan Palach, Rosa Luxemburg, and Ahmed Basiony. This almost Damien Hirst-like vitrine/shelves piece tackled a serious topic with an ingenious touch of humor.
Kader Attia, The Repair, 2012
Sanja Iveković, The Disobedients (The Revolutionaries), 2012

This year, documenta expanded to other locations including Kabul in Afghanistan, a country the West is currently at war with, and Alexandria-Cairo in Egypt, which had been centers of recent revolutions and conflicts. The interest in Kabul, at least for Christov-Bakargiev, came from the One Hotel inhabited by Alighiero Boetti from 1971 to 1977, when he made his series of embroidered tapestries of the world map in collaboration with Afghan and Pakistani women. The first Mappa was meant to be in documenta 5 in 1972, but it was delivered late. 40 years later at dOCUMENTA (13), Mappa (1971) was finally brought to the Fridericianum, alongside exhibits by Mexican artist Mario Garcia Torres on his search for the physical location of the One Hotel in Kabul. On the second floor of the Rotunda, Goshka Macuga’s large tapestry was hung on the curved wall. This one portraying a banquet in Kabul made a pair with the other one with an image of an award ceremony in Kassel, currently hung on a similar curved wall at the parallel d(13) venue in Kabul. A higher concentration of Afghan art was in the former Elisabeth Hospital. One of the most impressive was Zalmaï’s photo documentary on how war-related objects had become part of people’s everyday life in Afghanistan.
Alighiero Boetti, Mappa, 1971
Goshka Macuga, Of what is, that it is; of what is not, that is not, #1, 2012
Zalmaï, Ghost War: Playing with Empires

Of course, there were also some more “traditional” artworks at dOCUMENTA (13) that I didn’t need my guidebook to appreciate. It was fun to watch Llyn Foulkes fulfilling his childhood dream of a one-man band by playing on a set of homemade instruments with old-fashioned car horns. Maria Martins’s powerful anthropomorphic bronze sculptures and Hassan Khan’s glass knot created high contrast in the Neue Galerie. There was also Geoffrey Farmer’s installation of a five-decade timeline (1935-1985) using pictures cut from Life magazine. In the documenta-Halle, Thomas Bayrle’s installation reunited works from several periods of his career, including an airplane collage made up of thousands of small photos, an enormous wall piece made of cardboard, and the kinetic car engine sculptures. Indian artist Nalini Malani created her “video/shadow play” with dramatic projections and shadows cast by images of mythical figures and creatures reverse-painted on five transparent cylinders that revolved like Buddhist prayer wheels.
Llyn Foulkes, The Machine, instrument made in 1979
Maria Martins, O impossivel, 1945 (front)
Hassan Khan, The Knot, 2012
Geoffrey Farmer, Leaves of Grass, 2012
Thomas Bayrle, Carmageddon
Nalini Malani, In Search of Vanished Blood, 2012

Simple but powerful works by artists from less dominant cultures were quite refreshing in the narrative-heavy context of d(13). But maybe the inclusion of them was already a statement. Cambodian artist Sopheap Pich presented several wall-relief assemblages consisting of a three-dimensional box frame in bamboo, stretched cloth, soils around Cambodia and layers of local beeswax. It was quite touching to see his almost spiritual communication with materials. Similarly moving were paintings by Warlimpirrnga Tjapaltjarri and Doreen Reid Nakamarra, two Aboriginal artists from Papunya Tula Artists company in Australia. They took inspirations from traditional body and sand paintings associated with ceremony in the Western Desert. The results were dazzling fields of patterning that expressed their cultural heritage like Abstract Expressionist paintings.
Sopheap Pich, Seven Parts Relief, 2012
Warlimpirrnga Tjapaltjarri, Untitled, 2012
Doreen Reid Nakamarra, Untitled
   

Monday, September 10, 2012

More than craftsmanship

   
Architects make models. They are not just literal miniatures of reality but small-scale artworks. They are tools for exploration, communication, expression, and imagination. The German Architecture Museum (DAM) in Frankfurt has gathered about 300 objects around the world as well as from its own collection for an exhibition titled “The Architectural Model – Tool, Fetish, Small Utopia.” The show offers a systematic survey of architectural models from the early 20th century up to now and showcases the important role architectural models have played in pushing our profession forward.

Fetish
We love cute little objects. We use paper, wood, pressboard, foam, plexi, metal, plaster, resin, concrete, wires, and even straws, and make them into interesting shapes and compositions. They don’t need to be super sleek – they could also be rough and have a special quality of texture.

Oda Pälmke, Types. Good, Bad, and Ugly Houses
Eckhart Reissinger, Weekly Assignment No.3
Eckhart Reissinger, Weekly Assignment No.2
Barkow Leibinger, DAM Pavilion
Wolfgang Rathke, German Pavilion at World’s Fair Montreal
James Stirling and James Gowan, Churchill Collage, Cambridge
Peter Eisenman and Richard Serra, Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe, Berlin
Gottfried Böhm: Parliament Buildings, Bonn. Bronze cast
Roger Boltshauser, Residential High-rise Hirzenbach, Zurich

Some models are so well crafted that they become a fetish object. In Aldo Rossi’s studio on via Maddalena in Milan, many models were hung on the walls as if they were relief sculptures. In the office of Meixner Schlüter Wendt Architekten in Frankfurt, models of the early projects of the firm are arranged in two glass showcases like precious treasures. OMA protected the model of its Checkpoint Charlie project with a robust wooden box that can be unfolded to reveal the building’s surroundings.
Aldo Rossi, Muggiò City Hall. Rossi hang it on the wall in his study in Milan.
Meixner Schlüter Wendt Architekten, Model Showcases
Meixner Schlüter Wendt, Inserted object for the Markuschurch competition
OMA, House at Checkpoint Charlie, Berlin

Tool
The exhibition also features several Frei Otto’s experimental models. Back in the pre-digital era, it was hard to define accurately the forms of the structures Frei Otto envisioned. He needed models as a medium to “materialize the idea.” He used hanging models to optimize supporting structure of the Multihalle in Mannheim. It reminds me of Gaudi’s sandbag model of Sagrada Familia. Other form-finding tools include soap boxes and pouring boxes for sand. With the soap boxes, Frei Otto was able to find the “minimal surface” while the pouring boxes helped to visualize “pressure-loaded piles of material.”

Frei Otto, Multihalle Mannheim
Hanging model of the roof, Multihalle Mannheim
Frei Otto, German Pavilion at World’s Fair Montreal. Measuring model
Frei Otto, Soup Boxes

In addition to being a technical tool, models can also help to test architectural ideas. Herzog & de Meuron’s Prada Tokyo models reveal the evolution of the design process, including studies of massing, space, and materiality. Their fellow Swiss architect Christian Kerez presents the Swiss Re project with a series of core configuration tests.
Herzog & de Meuron, Prada Aoyama Tokyo study models
Prada Tokyo massing studies
Prada Tokyo material studies
Christian Kerez, Office Building Swiss Re, Zurich
Swiss Re concept models

Models are often used to study interior space as well. The DAM exhibition has an innovative way to present this aspect of models. A peeping wall is introduced with holes through which visitors can take a closer look into the models. The back of the wall is a “behind-the-scene” kind of stage-like setting.
Interior models
Marcel Meili and Markus Peter, Swiss University for Forest Economy. Classroom interior
Karl Wimmenauer, Protestant Church of the White Ladies

Small Utopia
On the second floor of the exhibition is a high concentration of fascinating models of utopian projects in the 1960s-70s, ranging from Archigram to Japanese Metabolism, from various modular systems to Raimund Abraham’s archetypical houses. Visionary architects of that time couldn’t build what they proposed in reality. So they built models to live their dreams, their mini-utopia. Oh, how I love the 60s!

Small utopias
Frei Otto, Residential House, Study for New York City, 1957
Arata Isozaki, Cluster in the Air, 1962
Archigram, Air Hab, 1966
Wolfgang Döring, Capsule Houses, 1969
Richard J. Dietrich, Metastadt Building System, 1970
Richard J. Dietrich, Metastadt for Altstadtring Nordost, Munich, 1972
Raimund Abraham, Poetik des Hauses, 1971-73

The most amazing thing is probably to see the huge OMA models for Parc de la Villette and the Melun-Sénart master plan. The details in the la Villette model fully visualize the vitality in the strict concept. Like the richness within the Manhattan grid, the strips can accommodate a wide range of different activities with many iconic attractions. The Melun-Sénart model represents the abstract urban framework that allows different players for further treatments. It’s a wild assemblage of strange materials: rough wood blocks, nails, acoustic foam pieces, and plastic brushed… You feel the passion. And you can read clearly the powerful idea behind the playful appearance.
OMA, Parc de la Villette, 1983
OMA, Melun-Sénart Urban Planning concept model, 1987